Tax implications of forex trading | Griffiths + Associates

Tax implications of forex trading: When Googling Tax Advice Leads You in the Wrong Direction

TAX IMPLICATIONS OF FOREX TRADING

This is one of those real-life cases that explain the issue better than any theory. Not long ago, we received the following request:

“I am Italian, and actually I own a company (SRL) in Romania…As I am going to close my business activities in Romania, and I would like to make my living doing Forex and ETF investments Full Time, I am looking for a jurisdiction with the lowest taxes on Capital Gains…I have been told that in Malta could be possible to pay ZERO taxes on capital gains, and then I would like to go deeper into this. Could you kindly help me to understand if this is really possible and, eventually, which way to go for that?”

At first glance, the question seems straightforward. In reality, it touches on several fundamental tax misconceptions that require a much deeper explanation. So, prepare yourself: a short question — but a very long explanation.

  1. The first problem: searching for answers instead of professional advice

Today, many people prefer to rely on AI tools, online articles, forums, or informal advice instead of consulting a specialist from the very beginning. There is nothing wrong with using AI, search engines, or online resources to build a general understanding. However, even AI tools themselves clearly warn users: “ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important information.” When it comes to taxes, cross-border planning, and residency, small misunderstandings can quickly turn into big problems. That’s why general information should never replace proper professional advice. 

  1. The second problem: a chain of mistakes starting from one wrong assumption

In this case, the client made a critical mistake at the very beginning – he automatically classified his regular Forex and ETF trading activity as capital gains. Once that label was applied, everything else followed naturally — but incorrectly. The reasoning goes like this: “I will earn capital gains” → “So I should look for a country with low or zero capital gains tax” → “I heard Malta might offer zero tax”

This is how one incorrect assumption generates a chain of further mistakes.

Let’s now address the core question: why regular Forex and ETF trading is generally not treated as capital gains for tax purposes — and why this completely changes the tax picture.

Let’s start with the capital gains definition

If you Google “capital gain definition”, you’ll most likely find something like this: “In simple terms, a capital gain is the profit you make when selling an asset, such as a stock, at a higher price than what you originally paid. Alongside dividends, this is one of the main ways investors earn money from stocks.”

So, is this definition wrong? Not really – economically correct, but legally incomplete. It describes what the profit looks like, not how tax law classifies it.

Why tax law sees things differently

Tax law does not classify income based only on the economic result (“I bought low and sold high”). Instead, it looks at how the profit is generated. In particular, tax authorities focus on:

  • How often you trade
  • With what intention
  • With what level of organization
  • At what level (private individual vs business)
  • Using which instruments

Because of this, the exact same transaction can be treated very differently for tax purposes:

  • as a capital gain for a passive investor
  • as business or trading income for a professional or full-time trader

This distinction is one of the most common sources of confusion when people talk about “capital gains”.

In everyday language, everything looks like a capital gain. In tax law, it often isn’t. Let’s break this down step by step.

Why “regular trading” is not treated as capital gains

In most tax systems — broadly across the EU — there is a clear distinction between investing and trading.

  1. Passive investment (capital gains)

Typical characteristics:

  • Occasional transactions or long-term holding
  • Buy → hold → sell
  • No systematic or organized activity
  • Not the person’s main source of income

Tax treatment: capital gains (often taxed at lower rates or even exempt)

  1. Trading as an activity (business income)

Typical characteristics:

  • High frequency of transactions
  • Short holding periods
  • Use of leverage (very common in Forex)
  • A systematic or repeatable strategy
  • Main or sole source of income
  • Carried out full-time

Tax treatment: trading or business income

Why Forex almost always falls into category B

Forex trading typically involves:

  • Currencies that are not held as long-term investments
  • Positions opened and closed frequently
  • Extensive use of leverage and derivatives
  • Profits generated from short-term price movements

For these reasons, regular Forex trading is almost always treated as a trading activity, not as capital investment.

Conclusion: Regular Forex or ETF trading does not constitute capital gains for tax purposes — even though it does economically.

ETFs: the same issue if traded actively

ETFs can generate capital gains if they are held long-term, sold only occasionally, and not part of a systematic trading strategy. However, if they are traded frequently — for example, day-traded, swing-traded, or used as a regular source of income — tax authorities will usually reclassify the profits as trading income. This approach is consistent across most EU jurisdictions.

Company level vs personal level: an important nuance

This point is often overlooked, but it is crucial. Why?

  • A company, by definition, is engaged in business
  • A company trading financial instruments is considered to be carrying out a trading activity
  • As a result, profits are trading profits, not capital gains
  • Even if the same trades were carried out by an individual:
  • occasional trading → capital gains
  • full-time trading → business income

 At company level, the argument for capital gains treatment is even weaker.

Why “Zero Capital Gains” Does Not Apply to Full-Time Trading

Malta is often misunderstood, mainly because of simplified or aggressive marketing that makes it sound like a tax haven for all types of investment income. In reality, while certain long-term capital gains may be exempt, this does not apply to professional trading activities. Once trading becomes frequent, organized, and your main source of income — as in the case of full-time Forex or ETF trading — tax authorities treat it as ordinary trading income. They don’t ask whether you are technically “making capital gains”; they ask whether you are making your living from this activity. If the answer is yes, any capital gains exemptions stop applying. Reclassification rules and anti-avoidance measures kick in, and “zero-tax” strategies collapse under scrutiny, whether the trading is carried out through a company or personally.

The conclusion is clear: there is no lawful way to pay zero tax on full-time Forex or ETF trading income, even in Malta. If the trading income is arising in or from Malta, then the profits thereof would be taxable in Malta.

The final takeaway — in one sentence

Capital gains apply to passive investors; full-time Forex or ETF trading is considered a business activity, so profits are taxed as ordinary trading income — even if economically they arise from selling assets at a profit.

© By Olga Saliba